STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

Moved from this post. Hello,   I'm currently working on the STM32H735G-DK dev board, using CubeIDE version 1.18.1 and integrated CubeMX version 6.14.1.202504091515, and this bug is still here. When I launch a debug, the firmware get stuck in the ExitRun0Mode function. After deleting the definition of USE_PWR_LDO_SUPPLY as you explained, everything works.  Regards,

Hi, I'm using the code generated by CubeMX ver 16.14.0 following the following link to develop a USBPD sink. https://wiki.stmicroelectronics.cn/stm32mcu/wiki/STM32StepByStep:Getting_started_with_USB-Power_Delivery_Dual_RoleI added an APDO to the PDO list but it is not working. I traced the issue to be coming from the USBPD_DPM_RequestMessageRequest function when it calculates the allowable power. It uses the DPM_SNKRequestedPower.MaxOperatingCurrentInmAunits found in the DPM_USER_Settings structure. The issue is that this value is not initialized. If I use the cubeMonitor-UCPD app, I can see that APDO is defined in the SINK capabilities tab, so the data is there somewhere. Additionally, if I press "SEND TO TARGET", the DPM_SNKRequestedPower.MaxOperatingCurrentInmAunits found in the DPM_USER_Settings is now correct. Is this an issue related to missing initialization in the code generated by the cubeMX which is leaving the DPM_USER_Settings to

Hello, I have Version STM32CubeIDE : 1.18.0, and I get a program that was communicated to me, but I have this message below :  And I downloaded and installed STM32CubeMX 6.14.1 version, but it seems that it is not taken into account in the environment of STM32CubeIDE version 1.18.0.  Here is the path I installed the STM32CubeMX 6.14.1 version How to link STM32Cube IDE with STM32CubeMX so I can open the program. Thank you for your helps.

Hello,I am using STM32F769 microcontroller.  I have used Cube MX to configure USART1 for Tx and Rx and DMA channels 2 and 7.  I have started a data transmission using HAL_DMA_Start function but noting is happening.  Using debugger I have found that in USART1 CR3 the DMAT and DMAR are reset.  When I put a break point at the point where HAL_DMA_Start is called and manually set DMAT in CR3 the data is transmitted.  Have I missed something in the configuration of USART1 and DMA or do I need to write some code to set these bits after the MX generated initialisation code has finished?Thanks

Hello STM32 developers,I/m using STM32CubeMX 6.14.1I noticed that in middleware the selection "USB_DEVICE" has disappeared.Instead, "USBX" is listed, however it is for RTOS, and I don't use RTOS, so I'm left with nothing.I think the STMicroelectronics USB stack would still be available, somehow:https://wiki.stmicroelectronics.cn/stm32mcu/index.php?title=USBX_overview&oldid=10172Besides offering STMicroelectronics USB stack, USBX, the Azure RTOS USB embedded stack is currently supported and offered with a set of applications running on STM32 MCUs. How can I use the STMicroelectronics USB stack > "USB_DEVICE" instead?Do I need to install some software for it?

Hi all,I am using CubeMX 6.14 to generate an OpenAMP project for the STM32H747I-DISCO board. When I build the project, I receive the following warnings, and it results in an 'OpenAMP create endpoint' error at runtime. I used the same code and project created with CubeMX 6.12, and it works fine. Therefore, I suspect there might be an issue with CubeMX 6.14. Could someone please advise me on how to generate a working OpenAMP project using CubeMX?arm-none-eabi-gcc "D:/TouchGFXProjects/STM32H7_TUT/Drivers/STM32H7xx_HAL_Driver/Src/stm32h7xx_hal_rcc.c" -mcpu=cortex-m4 -std=gnu11 -g3 -DDEBUG -DCORE_CM4 -DUSE_HAL_DRIVER -DSTM32H747xx -DUSE_PWR_DIRECT_SMPS_SUPPLY -DMETAL_INTERNAL -DMETAL_MAX_DEVICE_REGIONS=2 -DRPMSG_BUFFER_SIZE=512 -DVIRTIO_SLAVE_ONLY -DRPMSG_BUFFER_SIZE -DNO_ATOMIC_64_SUPPORT -c -I../../../CM4/Core/Inc -I../../../Drivers/BSP/Components -I../../../Drivers/STM32H7xx_HAL_Driver/Inc -I../../../Drivers/STM32H7xx_HAL_Driver/Inc/Legacy -I../../../Drivers/CMSIS/Device/ST/STM32H7xx/Inc

Hi,I'm using STM32CubeIDE 1.18.1v, which includes STM32CubeMX 6.14.1v, and I'm seeing unexpected behavior when working with GPDMA1 on an STM32H5 device.When I configure a DMA channel with Request set to "Software", CubeMX generates full initialization code.However, as soon as I change the Request to any other peripheral trigger, for example TIM2_CH1, all of the DMA configuration disappears from the generated code. Only the RCC clock enable and interrupt configuration remain. Example 1 — Request = Software:static void MX_GPDMA1_Init(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN GPDMA1_Init 0 */ /* USER CODE END GPDMA1_Init 0 */ DMA_NodeConfTypeDef NodeConfig = {0}; /* Peripheral clock enable */ __HAL_RCC_GPDMA1_CLK_ENABLE(); /* GPDMA1 interrupt Init */ HAL_NVIC_SetPriority(GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn, 0, 0); HAL_NVIC_EnableIRQ(GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn); /* USER CODE BEGIN GPDMA1_Init 1 */ /* USER CODE END GPDMA1_Init 1 */ NodeConfig.NodeType = DMA_GPDMA_LINEAR_NODE; NodeConfig.Init.Request =

In our project we are using GPDMA for SAI transfers:STM32CubeMX 6.13.0STM32Cube_FW_U5_V1.7.0STM32U535RE targetX-CUBE-FREERTOS 1.3.0 (FreeRTOS 10.6.2)Description of the behaviour:We this .ioc configuration STM32CubeMX does not create the calls to `HAL_DMA_IRQHandler`.Note: in the past the time base call also was not generated (TIM6)A different .ioc we were using for the NUCLEO board was producing the correct/expected codeExample of expected code:void GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQHandler(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 0 */ /* USER CODE END GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 0 */ HAL_DMA_IRQHandler(&handle_GPDMA1_Channel0); /* USER CODE BEGIN GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 1 */ /* USER CODE END GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 1 */ }Actually generated code (note the missing call):void GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQHandler(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 0 */ /* USER CODE END GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 0 */ /* USER CODE BEGIN GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 1 */ /* USER CODE END GPDMA1_Channel0_IRQn 1 */ } W

Hello, I want to update STM32CubeMX and STM32Cube MCU Packages, but I can't do because of the error.I tried to run STM32CubeMX in admin mode, but the error occured again.1. How do you solve this error?2. Is 'STM32Cube Updater' a real file? # Error Text : "A 'STM32Cube Updater' (or another 'STM32CubeMX') software is downloading to the Repository folder. Please wait for the download to complete and retry"# In the Repository folder What file is being downloaded?  

“我想知道在哪里可以找到 STM32H7 系列 MCU 各种外设的 STM32CubeMX 配置教程。” Edited to add the English version : I want to know where to find the STM32CubeMX configuration tutorials for various peripherals of STM32H7 series MCU.

the below code generated by CubeMX. does not work.I need to change the GPIO_InitStruct.Speed = LL_GPIO_SPEED_FREQ_LOW;     to  GPIO_InitStruct.Speed = LL_GPIO_SPEED_FREQ_VERY_HIGH;  to make it work.   /* SPI1 init function */ void MX_SPI1_Init(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN SPI1_Init 0 */ /* USER CODE END SPI1_Init 0 */ LL_SPI_InitTypeDef SPI_InitStruct = {0}; LL_GPIO_InitTypeDef GPIO_InitStruct = {0}; /* Peripheral clock enable */ LL_APB2_GRP1_EnableClock(LL_APB2_GRP1_PERIPH_SPI1); LL_IOP_GRP1_EnableClock(LL_IOP_GRP1_PERIPH_GPIOA); /**SPI1 GPIO Configuration PA1 ------> SPI1_SCK PA2 ------> SPI1_MOSI PA6 ------> SPI1_MISO */ GPIO_InitStruct.Pin = LL_GPIO_PIN_1; GPIO_InitStruct.Mode = LL_GPIO_MODE_ALTERNATE; GPIO_InitStruct.Speed = LL_GPIO_SPEED_FREQ_LOW; GPIO_InitStruct.OutputType = LL_GPIO_OUTPUT_PUSHPULL; GPIO_InitStruct.Pull = LL_GPIO_PULL_NO; GPIO_InitStruct.Alternate = LL_GPIO_AF_0; LL_GPIO_Init(GPIOA

I would like to file a bug report for STM32CubeMX.During configuration of CORDIC using DMA, I have found the following issue:In:void HAL_CORDIC_MspInit(CORDIC_HandleTypeDef* hcordic) { if(hcordic->Instance==CORDIC) { /* USER CODE BEGIN CORDIC_MspInit 0 */ /* USER CODE END CORDIC_MspInit 0 */ /* Peripheral clock enable */ __HAL_RCC_CORDIC_CLK_ENABLE(); /* CORDIC DMA Init */ /* CORDIC_WR Init */ hdma_cordic_wr.Instance = DMA1_Stream0; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.Request = DMA_REQUEST_CORDIC_WRITE; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.Direction = DMA_MEMORY_TO_PERIPH; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.PeriphInc = DMA_PINC_DISABLE; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.MemInc = DMA_MINC_ENABLE; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.PeriphDataAlignment = DMA_PDATAALIGN_WORD; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.MemDataAlignment = DMA_MDATAALIGN_WORD; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.Mode = DMA_NORMAL; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.Priority = DMA_PRIORITY_LOW; hdma_cordic_wr.Init.FIFOMode = DMA_FIFOMODE_DISABLE; if (HAL_DMA_Init(&hdma_cordic_wr) != HAL_OK) { Error_Handler();

Hello STM32 developers,I'm using STM32CubeMX 6.14.1 and an STM32U5G7VJTx.When clicking :Generate Code" a Warning popup appears without comment.What can be the problem?I attached the ioc file.Thanks for helping out.

Hello,Now, when configuring NPU with STM32CubeMX, the generated code has the following problemI don't know what causes this problem. Could you please help me solve this problemAttached is my simple code, thank you

..

Hello everyone,I wanted to check if there is any updated information regarding when STM32CubeMX will officially enable generation and support of C++ code. Currently, I'm still relying on various workarounds to implement projects in C++, which unnecessarily complicates the development process.Does anyone have new insights or know of an official roadmap from STMicroelectronics? Adding native C++ support would be a significant improvement, especially for higher performance STM32 microcontrollers like the STM32H7, STM32U5, etc. series. C++ enables better code organization through object-oriented programming, making it easier to manage complex projects.

In previous iterations of ST Cube IDE, the project creation wizzard included a tick box to create a project based on TrustZone. This option seems to have been removed. I am using an STM32H755.Is there another way in which TrustZone based projects should now be created, and if so, could someone direct me to the revised documentation? I searched but maybe I am missing something?  

Using "Firmware Relative Path" currently have 2 problems:The path in the text field is displayed as absolute while the actual path is stored in the .ioc file as relativeThis is somewhat confusing to the user as CubeMX will display different (absolute paths) for different users with the same .ioc file.Targetting the MDK-ARM toolchain will generate/update an .uvprojx file with absolute paths and not relative pathsThis is an issue when the firmware is stored in a vcs repository and share among several developpers which don't have their local copy at the same location. For each developper re-generating code with CubeMX, absolute paths on its computer will be appended in the Keil file. Therefore we need to manually remove them in the .uvprojx file before commiting our changes to the repository.Would it be possible to use relative paths instead (or support them alongside absolute paths) in CubeMX and uVision project file ? Looking at other posts in the community, it seems CubeIDE has the sam

Hi, I am a software engineer from Macronix. Recently, we are meeting with ST to discuss the driver extension pack development. And I want to get some answers in advance, so I put some questions here.How to submit flash vendor's driver software extenstion pack we developed to ST for them test and validation? Where is the entry?The submission will finally make our extension pack available in ST CubeMX tool for all the users and our company name will show in the vendor list.Is there convention to follow? 

Hello,I'm stuck with Cube MX to build a M33  project for the STM32CubeMP257 Eval board STM32MP257x-EV1I managed to run the projects in the firmware repository but I didn't find any ioc file to use.Then, I tried to start a project with CubeMXBut it says the RCC config is wrong and I don't understand what is going on.The flag on RCC is green but it doesn't generate RCC code for the main.cIs it possible to find the ioc of the demo projects present in the firmware repository ?Best regardsStéphane Mancini   

It would be awesome if STM applications (in my case, STM32CubeMX) were available as packages for ease of installation and update. I believe this is even already the case for STM32CubeIDE. Software package managers are a precious tool for end users. It's always embarrassing when some app ships in other ways. I do understand that it might look daunting to maintain different packages for different operating systems (.deb, .rpm, homebrew, winget, ...), but almost every open source project manages to do that, so I believe it should be doable for any large company as well. It might allow to use the system JRE and eventually other dependencies directly as well, instead of shipping them together with each app. Bonus points would be if it was possible to download said packages from public repositories. But I understand this would remove the need to log in to an STM account to obtain the software, which you might not want. I've searched for appropriate place to post this, but couldn't be sure. I

  Moved from this thread. I just start new project nucleo-H755zi, and default config is quite different to HSE bypassed. If hardware pre-set to STLink provided clock, than why StmCubeMX doesn't initiate project in right way? Have to navigate into system core, change to bypass. Than have to set manually all clock tree, do useless work that has to be fixed by Cube developers.

Hello Community,I am using STM32h745 dual-core to display the value of the data received based on FDCAN. First, I created a project on TouchGFX and then imported the project on stm32CubeIDE.   I set the FDCAN1 and ADC1 both on CubeMX. But the workspace does not include 'stm32h7xx_hal_fdcan.c' and 'stm32h7xx_hal_adc.c' file. So, I add these the source.c files to the workspace under 'STM32H7XX_HAL_Driver' folder. and Actually, In the Project Folder, it has been generated automatically, but does not show up in the CubeIDE workspace.  I try the ADC functionality to display the potentiometer's values, to see if this ADC function working successfully.However, the functionality does not work. I do not know why the symbols are shown below, and the functionality does not work properly... Does anyone have the same problem when importing the project from TouchGFX? Please let me know, Thank you!

Originally I had the project initialize all devices in main.c.  Since the file was starting to get large, i went to the Code Generator in CubeMX and selected:The option to "Keep User Code when re-generating" just doesn't work reliably.  It seems it did not keep the "User Code" for the FMC device, and possibly the RTC device.... I now have to check each and every device manually.Original FMC init code:  /* FMC initialization function */ static void MX_FMC_Init(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN FMC_Init 0 */ /* USER CODE END FMC_Init 0 */ FMC_SDRAM_TimingTypeDef SdramTiming = {0}; /* USER CODE BEGIN FMC_Init 1 */ /* USER CODE END FMC_Init 1 */ /** Perform the SDRAM1 memory initialization sequence */ hsdram1.Instance = FMC_SDRAM_DEVICE; /* hsdram1.Init */ hsdram1.Init.SDBank = FMC_SDRAM_BANK1; hsdram1.Init.ColumnBitsNumber = FMC_SDRAM_COLUMN_BITS_NUM_9; hsdram1.Init.RowBitsNumber = FMC_SDRAM_ROW_BITS_NUM_13; hsdram1.Init.MemoryDataWidth = FMC_SDRAM_MEM_BUS_

Environment: Intel Mac, 12.7.6, CubeIDE 1.18.0, Device firmware STM32Cube FW_F4 V1.28.1 and othersI noticed that when I converted my project to use .c/.h pairs for device initialization, all of the custom peripheral initialization code got stripped. This lead to a week of debugging of "what did I break?"When using TouchGFX, the designer tool modifies the peripheral setup code to add in a whole bunch of custom code to setup and start devices like external RAM, FLASH, display controllers, and I2C devices. But if you convert your project to use .c/.h pairs, all of this code gets stripped and you end up with a long series of hard faults (accessing memory that isn't enabled), and a black screen (display controller never got turned on).I noticed that other customers were complaining about similar symptoms in the context of FreeRTOS and TouchGFX back in 2022 and there was an internal ticket generated. Well, the issue it still there and it has nothing to do with the use of FreeRTOS or TouchGFX