STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

HiAccording to the reference manual the high-cycle capable Flash of a STM32H562 is mapped to the address 0x0900_0000 to 0x0901_7FFF. The Memory Management Tool of CubeMX does not allow me to generate a Region in this address range (see Error below). Is this correct or should CubeMX not allow the generation of a memory region in this range? The Flash Option Byte was configured for the use of the high-cycle Flash.As a work around I can of course manually edit the linker script.I use STM32CubeMX Version 6.14 with the Firmware Package V1.5.0 to generate a STM32CubeIDE project on Windows 11.  

In STM32CubeMX, here is the orientation for a chip with a red dot marking pin 1 at the top left when text reads from left to right.In real life, here is the orientation for a chip with a red dot marking pin 1. As far as I'm aware, all STM32 chips are oriented like this, with pin 1 at the bottom left when text reads from left to right.

I am currently evaluating thefor use with 1000Base-T Ethernet and am attempting to configure the peripherals using STM32CubeMX. While following the same process as with other STM32 chips, I was unable to find the Ethernet configuration under Pinout & Configuration -> Connectivity. Could you kindly advise where I should configure the Ethernet settings?Thank you for your assistance.

Hi ST, This is just to let you know that STM32CubeMX version 6.17.0 does not generate correct cmake file for the STM32WL33 and this error results in the microntroller not starting up correctly but hangs in function  SystemInit() in system_stm32wl3x.c.   The problems is that the wrong is -mcpu is generated. The problem can be found in the file -> path/to/dir/cmake/gcc-arm-none-eabi.cmake # MCU specific flags set(TARGET_FLAGS "-mcpu=cortex-m4 ") // wrong for the WL33 # MCU specific flags set(TARGET_FLAGS "-mcpu=cortex-m0plus ") // correct for the WL33 Ola

I just bought a Nucleo-G491RE board and installed STM32CUBE to start a new project. During the project setup, the IDE downloaded and unzipped stm32cube_fw_g4_v160.zip. Then, when it downloaded stm32cube_fw_g4_v161.zip, this error message popped up. (screenshot below) Error downloading the following filesstm32cube_fw_g4_v161.zip (HTTP Access Forbidden) I'd appreciate any help to resolve the error. Thanks.    

I downloaded stm32cubemx-win-v6-17-0.zip on Windows 11 direct from the ST web page:STM32CubeMX | Software - STMicroelectronicsDownloaded file size 676,525 MBBut it does not uncompress and install, all I get is a kind of ghost window that tries to launch but then aborts.Any ideas please?Kind regards,Al

Hi ST,I’m trying to configure the clocks for the STM32C071GBUx MCU in CubeMX (latest version, 6.17).This MCU has two SPI interfaces, two UARTs, and two I²C peripherals. However, CubeMX only allows me to configure the clock for one UART, one I²C, and no SPI at all.Am I missing something?I’ve attached the complete clock configuration diagram below.

This thread is split from this old discussion @FBL  RCC_USBPHY1REFCLKSOURCE_OTGPHY1 and RCC_USBOTGHS1CLKSOURCE_HSE_DIV2 are missing in generated code I created a simple FSBL application that is jump to the AppliThe Appli is using the same approach (SW solution) like it was implemented inside "Ux_Device_CDC_ACM" example, (it was migrated in to the Appli)Currently, during debug, I am observing the same issue like it was described before (stuck in USB_CoreReset() during checking the "USBx->GRSTCTL & USB_OTG_GRSTCTL_CSRST" )The solution, that you provided, it looks like it does not working anymore by using the latest Cube_FW and generated compilation errors (no defines for t

 When I click ACCESS TO MCU SELECTOR, the console prints :（I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, but the problem persists）command：jre\bin\java -jar STM32CubeMX.exe -ioutput：2024-10-09 19:44:07,992 [INFO] DbMcus:218 - Found 0 MCUs, 0 are supported2024-10-09 19:44:07,993 [INFO] ApiDb:423 - Load user favorites file C:\Users\PCH/.stm32cubemx/favorites.mcus.txt: 0 item(s)2024-10-09 19:44:07,993 [INFO] ApiDb:427 - User favorites MCUs=[]2024-10-09 19:44:07,993 [INFO] DbMcus:224 - Set 0 / 0 favorites MCU

In CubeMX Version 6.17.0, for STM32G474RET6, HRTIM1, TIMA output2 configuration, set sources is forced to 0 cannot be changed to 1 and it is showing "Set Sources: nothing to set as Dead Time is enabled, Output2 signal is defined based on Output1 Configuration Set Sources" even if Dead time is kept disabled. This issue was not present on previous versions of CubeMX.

Hi, everyone.I'm trying to configure I2S in a STM32H523CET. I'd like to activate MCLK signal, but I can't find how. I'd also like activate external clock input for I2s (AUDIOCLK signal). The CubeMX says:"Audio Clock Input is not available.To enable it, one of the following RCC Mode(s) or IP(s) have to be configured from the Pinout TAb:-EnableExtClockForSAI1"But again, I can't find where to activate that. 

STM32CubeMX 6.17.0 STM32CubeCLT 1.21.0 which provides GNU Tools for STM32 which provides a toolchain with GCC 14.3 and newlib 4.5.0. STM32CubeH5 1.6.0 (as downloaded by STM32CubeMX) STM32H563   With these tools, you can easily generate a project which uses ThreadX as RTOS and NetX Duo as network stack by point and click in STM32CubeMX. In this case, the project is generated to use CMake and the GCC toolchain. NetX Duo requires some random numbers even for non-cryptography use cases. E.g. this code for allocating a random ephemeral TCP port so that the other endpoint doesn't think an old socket is reused when the MCU restarts for some reason:   Middlewares/ST/netxduo/common/src/nx_tcp_client_socket_bind.c: UINT _nx_tcp_client_socket_bind(NX_TCP_SOCKET *socket_ptr, UINT port, ULONG wait_option) { ... /* Determine if the port needs to be allocated. */ if (por

Hello,STM32CubeMX installer on linux doesn't creating desktop entry file.Thanks in advance.

Dear STM expert:     Currently, Iam facing an issue:when using the stm32f030f6p6 chip, I cannot find this chip model when creating new projects in stm32cubeide and stm32cubeMX ,thus it making it impossible to new projects,what this?hope a reply..thanks.

CubeMX 6.17. When creating a new project for H533RETx or for the corresponding Nucleo-H533, SYSCLK is set at 32 MHz.Not sure whether or not it is intended, but it looks like a trap for a new user, since the MCU datasheet talks about 250 MHz.Instead, example projects for Nucleo-H533 (at least the couple that I've seen) quite reasonably run the MCU at 250 MHz, driven from the crystal present on the board.

Hi, I'm working on the STM32H7S7L86H with cube MX 6.17 and cube H7RS 1.3.0I need to use RNG in appli and boot context but it is grayed because it accept only one context. It also block the usage of the hash module.Any idea how to fix this ?Thanks 

Hi All,I have an issue with STM32CubeMX 6.17.0 (Windows 11 + Visual Studio Code)I want to start a STiRoT Full secure project (with DA and encryption) for STM32H573 with FREERTOS.But when I add the freertos software pack, I don't get any configuration options.Open STM32CubeMXStart My project from MCUSelect STM32H573IIK3Q (same as STM32H573I-DK)Enable ICACHE and MPU -> YesWith TrustZoneSoftware packs -> Select Component -> Cortex-M33 Secure -> X-CUBE-FREERTOS 1.5.0 -> CMSIS RTOS2 11.2.0 -> Core : TZ_Secure (I can't select Heap???)No configuration is shown

Hello, I have a simple CubeMX project with the STM32N6 MCU, and I cannot seem to be able to uncheck the FREERTOS option from the FSBL to move it to the Application.  Is there something I am doing wrong? Thank you 

Hi,I'm using STM32H5F5LJHxQ. External HSE Oscillator is 48MHz. RTC clock mux is set to HSE_RTC, divider set to "/48" and the tool shows correctly that RTC clock is 1000kHz (48MHz / 48).During my tests I discovered a wrong RTC time, error ~2%. (1.2 seconds deviation per minute)In the generated function HAL_RTC_MspInit() is see: (49 instead of the expected 48)PeriphClkInitStruct.RTCClockSelection = RCC_RTCCLKSOURCE_HSE_DIV49; If I change the configuration in CubeMX to create a divider of 47, the correct RCC_RTCCLKSOURCE_HSE_DIV47 is generatedIf I change the configuration in CubeMX to create a divider of 49, the correct RCC_RTCCLKSOURCE_HSE_DIV49 is. generated.If I manually set the correct RCC_RTCCLKSOURCE_HSE_DIV48 in the sources, the RTC runs correctly. Regards,Gunnar BohlenHMS Networks 

See attachment, field gets erased every time I re-generate code using STM32 CubeMX.problem seen on versionsSTM32CubeMX version 6.16.1uVuion/Keil version 5.43This has been ongoing for a while so problem does exist on older versions of both.

Hello,   maybe someone can check this,it seems to be incorrectly generated code. In my application for STM32H5xx I want to use ADC3. void HAL_ADC_MspInit(ADC_HandleTypeDef* hadc) { GPIO_InitTypeDef GPIO_InitStruct = {0}; RCC_PeriphCLKInitTypeDef PeriphClkInitStruct = {0}; if(hadc->Instance==ADC3) { ... .../* Peripheral clock enable */ __HAL_RCC_ADC_CLK_ENABLE(); This macro does not enable ADC3. #define __HAL_RCC_ADC_CLK_ENABLE() do { \ __IO uint32_t tmpreg; \ SET_BIT(RCC->AHB2ENR, RCC_AHB2ENR_ADCEN); \ /* Delay after an RCC peripheral clock enabling */ \ tmpreg = READ_BIT(RCC->AHB2ENR, RCC_AHB2ENR_ADCEN); \ UNUSED(tmpreg); \ } while(0) I think something like this is required: #define __HAL_RCC_ADC3_CLK_ENABLE() do { \ __IO uint32_t tmpreg; \ SET_BIT(RCC->AHB2ENR, RCC_AHB2ENR_ADC3EN); \ /* Delay after an RCC peripheral clock enabling */ \ tmpreg = READ_BIT(RCC->AHB2ENR, RCC_A

Hi,  i'm missing something in the configuration of alternate function on STM32C092. I can't get working alternare function on shared pin, interested physical pin are  PIN 1, 15, 20.  Example1: PIN15 only the function on PA8 are working properly, neither (PB0,PB1 or PB2) are working at all with any function even a simple toggle. I'm pretty sure that the Alternate Function property are being generated correctly. Example2: PIN20 Generating a PWM with TIM3_CH1 only works on PB6, if the same timer is passed to PB4 i can't get any output.

It has been verified that the installations of STM32CubeMX, STM32CubeIDE, and STM32CubeProgrammer are completed successfully and operate normally under standard conditions; however, when STM32CubeAI is installed, a critical issue arises in which STM32CubeMX no longer functions properly, specifically preventing the creation of new projects. This behavior was reproduced on two different computers, with identical results observed in both cases. Additional tests were conducted in which all programs were uninstalled and then reinstalled without STM32CubeAI, resulting in normal operation; subsequently, when all programs were reinstalled including STM32CubeAI, the issue reappeared, and finally, upon uninstalling only STM32CubeAI, STM32CubeMX returned to normal operation. This strongly suggests the existence of a direct conflict between STM32CubeAI and STM32CubeMX, and therefore guidance is requested to resolve this issue or to confirm whether it is a known bug, as well as any possible solu

When configuring the LEDs for the STM32H573I-DK using the STM32CubeMX it generated code which initializes the LED pins as PushPull (rather than OpenDrain).Lookign at the schematics of the STM32H573I-DK it seems to be not "the best option".Would you agree that OpenDrain (GPIO_MODE_OUTPUT_OD) is the better option here, rather than PushPull (GPIO_MODE_OUTPUT_PP)? /** * @brief Configures LED on GPIO. * @PAram Led LED to be configured. * This parameter can be one of the following values: * @arg LED1 * @arg LED2 * @arg LED3 * @arg LED4 * @retval BSP status */ int32_t BSP_LED_Init(Led_TypeDef Led) { int32_t ret = BSP_ERROR_NONE; GPIO_InitTypeDef gpio_init_structure; if ((Led != LED1) && (Led != LED2) && (Led != LED3) && (Led != LED4)) { ret = BSP_ERROR_WRONG_PARAM; } else { switch (Led

I'm running Bazzite (Fedora 43) and tried to install STM32CubeMX on a Fedora distrobox and was met with some issues.First, the installer is unable use /bin/chmod, this is fixed by switching out the installer's `jre\bin` directory for OpenJDK.Second, if you run as a normal user it fails with:com.izforge.izpack.api.exception.IzPackException: An error occured in java.lang.Thread.run() at Thread.java:1583 in com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.run() at UnpackerBase.java:241 in com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.unpack() at UnpackerBase.java:319 Caused by: com.izforge.izpack.api.exception.InstallerException: File execution failed in com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.unpack() at UnpackerBase.java:299 in com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.unpack() at UnpackerBase.java:483 in com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.executeFiles() at UnpackerBase.java:959