STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

The only HCLK frequency possible is 40MHz (ofcourse i need higher freq)Please help me resolve this.

Good day,after troubleshooting some issues related to a bootloader, I have figured out that the address of the interrupt vector table (SCB->VTOR) is defined in a hard-coded, non linker aware way as "SCB->VTOR = FLASH_BASE | VECT_TAB_OFFSET". This means, if the FLASH region is relocated to make space for a bootloader, it requires manual changes to "VECT_TAB_OFFSET".Is there any reason, why we don't use the address of "g_pfnVectors" (the actual vector table) instead? This would always point to the vector table as defined in the startup code.Of course, I can simply add "SCB->VTOR = (uint32_t)&g_pfnVectors;" to the start of the main(), but I'm trying to understand, why the default value is hard-coded instead of using the actual table location.Can someone explain that to me? CubeMX Version: 6.12.0Controller: STM32C031K6TxAlso on STM32G431 with an older CubeMX version

 In STM32CubeMX 6.13.0 - Application Structure is Basic and gray.I solved it by editing the ioc file, it remains gray, but at least "Advanced" is selected and the code is generated accordingly.I changedProjectManager.MainLocation=SrctoProjectManager.MainLocation=Core/Src Is it intended to work like this?

Good Morning All,I have good experience on stm32 microcontrollers and cubemx, but I am new when it comes to LwIP.I followed some basic setups to generate the code using CubeMX tool.1.Selected the board as Nucleo-F207ZG,configured clock on 120Mhz.2.Enabled Ethernet module in RMII mode,configured UART3 just for debugging.3.Enabled LwIP stack and I didn't change any settings for this.I followed what by default settings were there.I have some info on LwIP so I new we need to call MX_LWIP_Process() function in while loop.I made such code that until the board gets IP address it stays in while loop and movement it gets the IP address it breaks that loop and jumps to next while loop in which only MX_LWIP_Process() function is running.Key Option Settings I am here because I am able to ping the board from my laptop,but not able to connect to the software Hercules(TCP Server).I have attached my code zip and also pasted the main.c code.  

Good Morning All,I have good experience on stm32 microcontrollers and cubemx, but I am new when it comes to LwIP.I followed some basic setups to generate the code using CubeMX tool.1.Selected the board as Nucleo-H753ZI and set clock to 120MHZ.2.Enabled Ethernet module in RMII mode,configured UART2 just for debugging.3.Enabled LwIP .my goal is to setup the TCP server on STM32.But im unable to do so.when i generate the code and start running the program m facing the issue in command prompt like connection issue or host unreachable or request timed out . firstly im not conformed about configuration setting i need to do so that it works according to my requirement.some people say to change the stack size and RAM size but im unable to deal with them and confused regarding the out.coming to physical connection,i connected my nucleo board with PC and ethernet cable from PC to the board.can anyone help me in this regard and let me know what configuration i can make in cubeMX so that i can

Hello everyoneI changed my PC to one with Win11 and I cannot install the CubeMX.After I downloaded and started the setup, the extracting windows appears and after the splash screen remains opened for few second and then close.Nothing else, I have a project to finish at my job and I do not have success with any of the trick in the forum.Please help me Leonardo Orazi

Hi!I have created a few projects to practice working with the STM32H series. Then, I selected SPI or I2C and used GPDMA linked-list. According to many tutorials, I should have gone to the utilities folder to configure GPDMA, but such a folder did not exist. I performed this on two PCs. CubeMX is up to date. Janusz

I enabled this option to activate the virtual COM port for debug reasons: It is a CMake Project to be opened in VS-CodeEnabling the Virtual Com Port in CubeMX results in this error in VS Code:Crawling in the files, I found that the stm32h5xx_nucleo_conf.h the USE_BSP_COM_FEATURE is not enabled.Enabling this manually will result in many more errors:Generating the code again will reset the USE_BSP_COM_FEATURE to 0.Did I forget or overlook something?

Hi, I am using the STM32G0B1CBTx on the STM32CubeMX and setting the I2C1 for SMBus-two-wire-Interface. I want to disable the timeouts but I noticed that when I do so, the clock timeout enable (bit 15 of I2C_TIMEOUTR register) is still high. Looking at the generated timeout value to be written in the register (0x0000830D), it shows that indeed, the STM32CubeMX is enabling the timeout even though I selected Disable. Below is a screenshoot showing this. Is this a bug in MX ?  

Hello,I am using STM32H730ZBT6 with STM32 CubeMX V6.12.1 (I am not using the newest version because of the problem related in topic Downgrade STM32CubeProgrammer in STM32CubeIDE. I dont' know exactly if CubeMX would reproduce the problem, but for the case...) and I have detected 2 problems in code generation:1. Eventhough I am using peripheral SDMMC2 the code generated in file "fx_stm32_sd_driver_glue.c" is prepared for SDMMC1. Here a code portion as example: extern SD_HandleTypeDef hsd1; #if (FX_STM32_SD_INIT == 1) extern void MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init(void); #endif 2. If the option "Generate peripheral initialization as a pair of '.c/.h' files per peripheral", some erros ocur because "fx_stm32_sd_driver_glue.c" file doen't know where to find functions and instances, and is necesary to include "sdmmc.h" file. A part of those twoo problems, in functions "void HAL_SD_TxCpltCallback(SD_HandleTypeDef *hsd)" and "void HAL_SD_RxCpltCallback(SD_HandleTypeDef *hsd)" hsd is not used, so

Moved from MPUs forum; STM32F072 is an MCU - not an MPU.Hi,I've just started a new project for a STM32F072 chip using STM32CubeIDE 1.17.0.When adding FreeRTOS support to my project, the program hangs soon after osKernelStart() is called.I had hard time finding the culprit.The problem is that the SysTick_Handler() present in cmsis_os2.c is not used (It is surrounded with #if defined(SysTick) /  #endif).Because os this, the default handler is called (infinite while loop).I've worked around this problem by copying the SysTick_Handler() function in my code. But this problem should be fixed in the STM32CubeIDE code generator.Best regards,Nicolas

I get this error in downloading files in side stm32cubemx:error downloading the following files: crdb_full.zip

The new CMake generation is great! It's very tastefully done (toochain file, presets, simple CMakeLists.txt, etc).My request: I want to add some additional compiler flags (like `-Wconversion`) to my project.In the top CMakeLists.txt I did:```cmaketarget_compile_options(${CMAKE_PROJECT_NAME} PRIVATE"-Wconversion")```The problem is that it applies to the HAL as well, generating an endless stream of errors.I could create a new cmake target for my own functions, but I wish the generated CMake template would support this out of the box.  Regards,Gabriel

Hi,We are working on a board with the STM32H7S7Z8J6 in a BG144 package. We use cubemx to create the correct pinout for this part, but we see the datasheet has different pinout then the CubeMX tool. Is this a bug in CubeMX?   

I made a change to my project (using an STM32H7S3L8 part), saved the results, and a few days later tried to reload the project, but got a "Not a valid ioc file" error message.  Here is the output of the log file:```2025-02-17 10:59:38,352 [FATAL] ProjectFactory:568 - Exception caughtjava.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: ""at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:67) ~[?:?]at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:719) ~[?:?]at java.lang.Long.valueOf(Long.java:1157) ~[?:?]at com.st.microxplorer.mcu.memorymap.MemInfoExtractor$ETHInfoExtractor.onETHEnable(MemInfoExtractor.java:4561) ~[STM32CubeMX:?]at com.st.microxplorer.mcu.memorymap.MemInfoExtractor.completInit(MemInfoExtractor.java:252) ~[STM32CubeMX:?]at com.st.microxplorer.mcu.memorymap.MemoryMapService.MMTActivated(MemoryMapService.java:1259) ~[STM32CubeMX:?]at com.st.microxplorer.mcu.memorymap.MemoryMapService.loadConfigV3(MemoryMapService.java:2578) ~[STM32CubeMX:?]at com.st.microx

Good morning, I recently created a project using an STM32F469NI - disco (2Mb flash, 320 KB Sram) board. Firstly, I created a project with the board default configuration, add the peripherals and labeled some pins. Later, I added Touch GFX as a software pack to create a simple screen conformed by an image and a text area. The problem comes when I try to compile the project, it does not fit the memory. C:/Z-Eneko/STM32CubeIDE_1.13.2/STM32CubeIDE/plugins/com.st.stm32cube.ide.mcu.externaltools.gnu-tools-for-stm32.12.3.rel1.win32_1.1.0.202410251130/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/12.3.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld.exe: SPI_PROJECT_0.elf section `ExtFlashSection' will not fit in region `FLASH'C:/Z-Eneko/STM32CubeIDE_1.13.2/STM32CubeIDE/plugins/com.st.stm32cube.ide.mcu.externaltools.gnu-tools-for-stm32.12.3.rel1.win32_1.1.0.202410251130/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/12.3.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld.exe: SPI_PROJECT_0.elf section `TouchGFX_Framebuffer' w

Despite referring to the STM32F0 label (can't this forum have a simple one labeled as a general problem for STM32CubeMX???) the problem exists for ALL situations and MCU's where you simply start working with the STM32CubeMX.Since several years ago, some colleagues on this form (and myself for 1-2 months) continue to report a completely stupid mess in the stm32CubeMX that makes it completely useless (again I attach a picture of today's nonsense and that completely prevented me simply from doing my work at the University - I'm sick of it!) No one at TS has (apparently) spent even a minute trying to solve such a stupid problem. For now (and against my will) I will migrate to NXP MCUs, which at least the configuration software works! As soon as someone at ST fixes the problem (which drags on for years!) please let me know.

Posted on October 29, 2017 at 01:12Hi all,I would like to report a bug of CubeMX.I did generated simple project for STM32F103VEx.  Project if fairly simple just uses USB in CDC mode.I did generate similar project for same processor but only SPI3 using shared pins PB3 and PB4 with JTAG.Each time while I did generated those projects CubeMX forces to distable whole debug communication JTAG +SWDby adding line    /**DISABLE: JTAG-DP Disabled and SW-DP Disabled      */   __HAL_AFIO_REMAP_SWJ_DISABLE();While SWD could be turned on since it does not conflicts with any of those peripherals. STM32 have options to disable only JTAG or either distable only NRJST pin in JTAG. Why CubeMX forces to kill all of the debug communication ?Simple project attached. Example file located in testCDC/stm32f1xx_hal_msp.c function void HAL_MspInit(void)https://community.st.com/tags♯/?tags=stm32%20cube%20mx https://community.st.com/tags♯/?tags=stm32f103%20usb https://

Hello,When generating code via CubeMX, the main code does not contain the configuration for the GPIO pins I need to be using.I have checked other solutions and seen that the pins need to be assigned to the core (in this case it would be the M3). The option to do this doesn't seem to be available; is there any hidden menus I need to be looking for? Thanks

CubeMX under Monterey seems to now think that all of my ioc files are read-only and not valid project files.Also, when I <File><Load Project> no files or directories show up in my Documents directory. This all worked before I updated to Monterey.

I have a STM32F469I-DISCO board. It seems that I am unable to change the GPIO Pull-up/Pull-down Mode for a timer. I have tried to do it both in the CubeMX interface, and I have also looked through the HAL methods and attributes. I don't think it's an option. Does anyone happen to know why? 

I'm using STM323H755ZIT6 NUCLEO board, STM32CubeMX 6.13.0 and STM32CubeIDE 1.17.0.In my scenario, I created a project in STM32CubeMX 6.13.0 and generated the project. After that, I opened this project in STM32CubeIDE 1.17.0 and added paths for external folders in Paths and Symbols. Later, I edited the .IOC file in STM32CubeMX and tried to regenerate the project, but an error popup appeared.ERROR POPUPAfter this popup, I clicked the OK button, and STM32CubeMX showed 'Project Successfully Generated.' However, when I tried to build the project in STM32CubeIDE, it failed to build, and errors appeared, such as:D:/NAVANEETHAN/CoffeeMaker/DisplayControl/Project/DisplayControl/CM7/Core/Src/main.c:116: undefined reference to `HAL_Init'D:/NAVANEETHAN/InstalledSoftwares/STM32CubeIDE_1.17.0/STM32CubeIDE/plugins/com.st.stm32cube.ide.mcu.externaltools.gnu-tools-for-stm32.12.3.rel1.win32_1.1.0.202410251130/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/12.3.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld.exe: A total of

Hey guys,Why are the "SYS" settings simultaneously unavailable for Boot and Application? There may be a reason, but it's somewhat unclear.   Thank you, and as always:"Always be yourself unless you can be a pirate. Then always be a pirate." 

Hello,I'm trying to install the latest version of cubemx on my widows machine and I'm always getting an error "File execution returned 1" Failed to execute com.st.stm32cube.ide.common.services.mx.jar-1.17.0-rc1.jar. This happens on step 6/14 of overall installation progress. I click ok and the installation finishes. After this the cubemx does nothing when I try starting the application. I've updated to the latest version of Java without any success.Any help would be greatly appreciated!

I have created a project for the STM32H747I-DISCO and have deadlocked the MCU twice. a BIG thanks to ST for not having ANY warning about this. The DISCO board comes configured to default to SMPS mode. The project I created, without any warnings, defaulted to LDO mode. I corrected the problem using the process described in UM2411, section 5.2.3 only to go right back into the deadlock condition when downloading code.I now know that I must set the power mode to SMPS but I cannot find this setting in CubeMX. I am using CubeIDE v1.17.0. Where is the power settings for LDO and SMPS?????