STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

Hi : I want to know which MCU support BC1.2, how can I use CubeMX to filter these MCU? 

Hello,I have an existing project and I'm attempting to retrofit it with TrustZone, starting with a new IOC file that will be the basis of the project which I will then retrofit my code into. I'm starting with a clean slate ioc file for the STM32U545CET6 from CubeMX. Is there a way to enable TrustZone with all memory 'whitelisted' such that all accesses are allowed? If so, please provide details such that the firmware will operate (initially) as if TrustZone were not there. I either want to:1. Make everything in the processor secured (such that I have zero access errors) and get my firmware running. Selectively mark certain parts of my application unsecured one-by-one to ensure I don't break anything too badly.2. Make everything in the processor unsecured (such that I have zero access or TZ errors) and get my firmware running. Selectively mark certain parts of my application secure one-by-one to ensure I don't break anything too badly.&n

Hello ST Community,I'm working on an STM32 project where I use TIM1 Input Capture + DMA to log timestamps of Hall sensor edges (motor feedback) on TIM1_CH1 (PA8). The captured values (CCR1) are stored in a circular DMA buffer.I have a 1ms PID interrupt, where I:- Poll the DMA buffer to process new timestamps- Calculate motor speed- Generate precise PWM signalsSo, I do not want DMA interrupts, because I manually poll the buffer in the PID loop.---Problem I'm Facing:I'm also running CAN communication in this project.When the Hall sensor edge interrupts were enabled, they sometimes delayed or blocked CAN transmissions, especially when the motor is running at high speeds.That’s why I switched to DMA-based Input Capture

Hi Team,I'm currently transitioning from using UART interrupt with timeout to DMA-based reception on an STM32G4 controller. I’d like to implement a similar behavior where I can detect the end of a UART message using idle line detection while receiving data via DMA.Is there a recommended way to combine DMA reception with UART idle timeout on STM32G4? Specifically:Are there any best practices or example configurations for this setup?

I download the latest firmware package "stm32cubeh5-v1-5-0.zip" for STM32H5, from ST's website. I followed following instructions to install it via STM32CubeMX:Open STM32CubeMX.  Go to Help > Manage embedded software packages.  Choose the desired STM32Cube MCU Package for your specific series (e.g., STM32CubeL4 f

Hi, I am thinking the same topic today. Security software is important today, not only hardware. Middle-ware/components need to be upgraded which is required by EN 18031 standard. We hope ST apply new version mbedTLS in the next STM32Cube release. -Engin Edit: moved from mbedTLS with support of TLS_1.3 in STM32CubeMX

I am using STM32CubeMX Version 6.13.0 and targeting the STM32H743BIT6.The CAD export option fails with the error: "Download interruption: CAD download fails due to AxiosError: Request failed with status code 500".I first experienced this with an older version of CubeMX about a week ago and the error persists today with the latest version (6.13.0) of CubeMX.To replicate the error:Start a CubeMX project targeting the STM32H743BIT6. Configure at least 1 pin. Go to the 'Tools' tab, CAD option.Select KiCAD v6+ and 3D STEP.Select pi

I was checking maximum frequencies of some MCUs and noticed i can pick ADC frequency in CubeMX clock configuration up to 80MHz for TSSOP-20 STM32G030. Its maximum frequency is 64MHz.Datasheet states it can deliver maximum 2Msps on 12 bit but with its 1.5 Sampling and 12.5 conversion cycles it reaches way higher sample rates.I checked some of the reference manual chapters and did not noticed anything unusual, prescalers seems to accept /1 divisions as well.I am not familiar with reference manuals. Datasheet 5.3.17 also shows 35MHz maximum frequency. What's the thing i am missing? Is it a bug on interface?

The MCU of NUCLEO-U031R8 is LQFP64. But if I import the example of NUCLEO-U031R8, STM32CubeMX shows it as UFBGA64. 

Hi Everyone,I noticed that CubeMX (version 6.14.0) generates a call to HAL_OSPI_DLYB_SetConfig in octospi.c even though I have configured the OctoSPI to bypass the delay block.Is it safe to just remove any Delay Block related code?Is this a bug in CubeMX? It increases the code size, so I would like it to be removed if it's not necessaryMy target is a Nucleo-U5A5. Thanks!Timon Zijnge 

Hello everyone,I am currently working on a project with a STM32U545. There was a first prototype electronics + software that was working. I made a new hardware and I wanted to use the same code with just a few modification.For this, I just copied the STM32CubeIDE project, modified the configurator with the integrated CubeMX, regenerated the code and compiled.This is where I ran into problems:I have this compilation error:../Drivers/STM32U5xx_HAL_Driver/Inc/stm32u5xx_hal_uart_ex.h:231:36: error: unknown type name 'UART_HandleTypeDef'; did you mean 'RTC_HandleTypeDef'? 231 | HAL_StatusTypeDef HAL_RS485Ex_Init(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart, uint32_t Polarity, uint32_t AssertionTime, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | RTC_HandleTypeDefSTM32Cube IDE version:  1.18.0STM32CubeMX version: 6.14.0When looking at the generated driver (file stm32u5xx_hal_uart.h), I noticed that the UART_Hand

Hello,Previously I had CubeMX 6.13.0 and here is the code which was autogenerated and working as expected for RS485 communication, where I have manually handled the Direction pin in my code.static void MX_LPUART1_UART_Init(void) { hlpuart1.Instance = LPUART1; hlpuart1.Init.BaudRate = 115200; hlpuart1.Init.WordLength = UART_WORDLENGTH_8B; hlpuart1.Init.StopBits = UART_STOPBITS_1; hlpuart1.Init.Parity = UART_PARITY_NONE; hlpuart1.Init.Mode = UART_MODE_TX_RX; hlpuart1.Init.HwFlowCtl = UART_HWCONTROL_NONE; hlpuart1.Init.OneBitSampling = UART_ONE_BIT_SAMPLE_DISABLE; hlpuart1.AdvancedInit.AdvFeatureInit = UART_ADVFEATURE_NO_INIT; if (HAL_RS485Ex_Init(&hlpuart1, UART_DE_POLARITY_HIGH, 0, 0) != HAL_OK) { Error_Handler(); } if (HAL_UARTEx_SetTxFifoThreshold(&hlpuart1, UART_TXFIFO_THRESHOLD_1_8) != HAL_OK) { Error_Handler(); } if (HAL_UARTEx_SetRxFifoThreshold(&hlpuart1, UART_RXFIFO_THRESHOLD_1_8) != HAL_OK

Hi,I have a project working on a STM32U5 and I was curious to port it to STM32U3 to see the differences in power consumption.I have built the project for the STM32U3 with CubeMX with the firmware packet "FW_U3 V1.1.0" , which is currently the latest available.My project uses ADF1 to acquire the signal from a digital microphone among other things.I configured all the pheripherals and added my code without any problem but when I built the project the mdf.c source file in function "void HAL_MDF_MspInit(MDF_HandleTypeDef* mdfHandle)" (which is automatically generated by CubeMX) gave me an undefined reference error for this definition "IS_ADF_INSTANCE(mdfHandle->Instance)".IS_ADF_INSTANCE() is missing.I look into my STM32U5 project and this Macro is defined in file "stm32u5xx_hal_mdf.h" .I added it manually into the USER CODE of my STM32U3 mdf.c file and the p

Is there a way to edit the auto-generated code in CubeMX, such as in the function below?please see the code below:void MX_USART2_UART_Init(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN USART2_Init 0 */ /* USER CODE END USART2_Init 0 */ /* USER CODE BEGIN USART2_Init 1 */ /* USER CODE END USART2_Init 1 */ huart2.Instance = USART2; #ifdef SLOW_CLOCK huart2.Init.BaudRate = 9600; #else huart2.Init.BaudRate = 152285; #endif huart2.Init.WordLength = UART_WORDLENGTH_8B; ... }Edited to apply source code formatting - please see How to insert source code for future reference.

1.这一套硬件第三方开发已实现porting RN8302B，现在自己开发发现无法工作，线路图如下：2.在MX里配置没有像F103那样的项目，如下为H563的SPI配置3.导入RN8302B 驱动编译通过后， 发现无法读取到RN8302B deviceID,串口打印信息为0XFFFFFFFF：

Hello,A set of new constants have been added to stm32g070xx.h by CubeMX v6.15.0, and one of them has the wrong value (at line 4200):#define RCC_CFGR_SWS_LSE (0x00000100UL) /*!< LSE used as system clock */According to the datasheet, the right value for LSE is 0x00000020UL. Thanks.

The following line of code is generated by CubeMX v6.14.0.202502271554 for a STM32G070RBTx using FW Package v1.6.2:LL_ADC_SetCommonPathInternalCh(__LL_ADC_COMMON_INSTANCE(ADC1), LL_ADC_AWD_CH_VREFINT_REG|LL_ADC_AWD_CH_TEMPSENSOR_REG);The constants used are for the Analog Watchdog in ADC_CFGR1 and have no relation to the internal path configuration in ADC_CCR.  This can configure the wrong internal paths and change the ADC clock prescaler.As stated in the function description, the constants should be one of the following: * @PAram PathInternal This parameter can be a combination of the following values: * @arg @ref LL_ADC_PATH_INTERNAL_NONE * @arg @ref LL_ADC_PATH_INTERNAL_VREFINT * @arg @ref LL_ADC_PATH_INTERNAL_TEMPSENSOR * @arg @ref LL_ADC_PATH_INTERNAL_VBAT Regards,

I encountered a bug in the initialization code for HRTIM generated by CubeMX in STM32CubeIDE.Delayed Protection is enabled for HRTIM Timer F despite the "Delayed Protection Mode"="No Action" in the timer configuration. This does not happen for other HRTIM timers.This error occurred in my project with STM32G474RBT6 in STM32CubeIDE 1.17 (CubeMX 6.13) but I reproduced this bug on a clean installation of STM32CubeIDE 1.19.0 (CubeMX 6.15.0).All you need to do is set the LL driver for HRTIM and enable Timer F.In the MX_HRTIM1_Init function in main.c, there is a function call:LL_HRTIM_TIM_EnableDLYPRT(HRTIM1, LL_HRTIM_TIMER_F)I solved it by calling the function LL_HRTIM_TIM_DisableDLYPRT(HRTIM1, LL_HRTIM_TIMER_F) in the following USER CODE block...

Platform: linuxSteps to reproduce:+ Create a new STM32 Project- Select Board->H753ZI - STM32Cube FW_H7: V1.12.1- copy only the necessary library files and finish+ Select board options all+ Software Packs | Select Components | X-CUBE-AZRTOS-H7 3.4.0 | RTOS | ThreadX | Core (6.4.0): Enable+System core | SYS  | Timebaser soruce: TIM6- Middleware and Software Packs | X-CUBE-AZRTOS-H7 | RTOS ThreadX: Enable- Middleware and Software Packs | X-CUBE-AZRTOS-H7 | RTOS ThreadX: Enable | Core Init: check| Application Thread:TrueSave ioc, generate code and build22:36:05 **** Build of configuration Debug for project h7_tx_3.4.0_iter02 **** make -j4 all arm-none-eabi-gcc -mcpu=cortex-m7 -g3 -DDEBUG -DTX_INCLUDE_USER_DEFINE_FILE -c -x assembler-with-cpp -MMD -MP -MF"Middlewares/ST/threadx/ports/cortex_m7/gnu/src/tx_thread_context_restore.d" -MT"Middleware

For COMP1 on STM32G0 here are the pin assignments from the reference manualI want PA1 and so I've chosen that in the STM32CubeMXHowever, the generated code sets 

I created a project in CubeMX for STM32G0B1. I added ThreadX middleware. I chose "Add necessary library files as reference..." I generated a CMake project. It was good, it worked fine. After a few weeks of work and dozens of regenerations CubeMX leaves out ThreadX C sources from the generated CMakeLists.txt.

HiWe work on a project with a STM32H562. We use STM32CubeMX Version 6.14 with the Firmware Package V1.5.0 to generate a STM32CubeIDE project on Windows 11. I just found a wrong description in CubeMX.The description for SRAM2_ECC, SRAM3_ECC and BKPRAM_ECC, says the parameter in CubeMX needs to be set to “Disabled” to enable ECC check.Assuming I want to disable ECC, I would set the option to “enable” in CubeMX. CubeMX then adds OB_SRAM2_ECC_ENABLE, OB_SRAM3_ECC_ENABLE and OB_BKPRAM_ECC_ENABLE in MX_FLASH_Init(). All three options are defined in stm32h5xx_hal_falsh_ex.h as 0. According to chapter 7.11.24 of the reference manual, setting the bit to 0 in the register, enables ECC (exactly the opposite of what I wanted). Therefore, the description in CubeMX is wrong. To Disable ECC, configure Disable in CubeMX and to enable ECC, configure enable.

HiWe work on a project with a STM32H562. We use STM32CubeMX Version 6.14 with the Firmware Package V1.5.0 to generate a STM32CubeIDE project on Windows 11. I think I just found bug in the code generation of CubeMX.I could reproduce the bug below in a new empty CubeMX Project.In Flash setting its possible to change the Flash Option Bytes Settings for the SRAM erase upon system reset. For SRAM2_RST this works as expected, and the code is generated in MX_FLASH_Init().But the option for SRAM13_RST does not work.If enabled or disabled the following code with a comment about a missing parameter is generated.

Hello,create a project with the above settings and it will result in a build error (missing header file).Thank you.Best regards potter

I am working on a project using the STM32C092CBT6 microcontroller, which is specified to have 48 pins in a LQFP 48 (7x7x1.4mm) package. However, in the STM32CubeMX software, the package is displayed as having 63 pins.Could you please clarify if this is an issue with the STM32CubeMX software configuration for the STM32C092CBT6