STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

 In CUBE MX I have selected the microcontroller STM32C071CBT6 When I set the sequencer option to "sequencer set to fully configurable" then the channels IN17 IN18 IN19 IN20 IN21 IN22 are hidden why?  is there any limitation for that channels or anything else?

I remeber there was the possibility to change MCU, but now I don't find it. How can I do ?  Thanks  

Hello Community,I have a Nucleo-U5A5ZJ-Q development board and have generated code for it using CubeMX (version 6.12.0).  The generated code contains this for the user button:void EXTI13_IRQHandler(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN EXTI13_IRQn 0 */ /* USER CODE END EXTI13_IRQn 0 */ BSP_PB_IRQHandler(BUTTON_USER); /* USER CODE BEGIN EXTI13_IRQn 1 */ /* USER CODE END EXTI13_IRQn 1 */ } If I enable the RNG in CubeMX and enable its global interrupt and then re-generate the code the above changes to:void EXTI13_IRQHandler(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN EXTI13_IRQn 0 */ /* USER CODE END EXTI13_IRQn 0 */ HAL_EXTI_IRQHandler(&H_EXTI_13); /* USER CODE BEGIN EXTI13_IRQn 1 */ /* USER CODE END EXTI13_IRQn 1 */ }Which doesn't compile as H_EXTI_13 is not defined anywhere that I can see in any file.  am I missing something or is this a gli

Hi,I have a CubeMX-generated code, where I want to receive data from the SPI. Unfortunately, the SPI2 ISR SPI2_IRQHandler() is never called. What I have checked/tried:hardware signals all are there and at the expected pinsinitialisation is done (it is CubeMX-generated code, so I do not expect any issues here)tried changing polarity of NSSinterrupts are enabled via __enable_irq();Anything else what could be missing/what should be checked?Thanks! 

I need to add the LwIP component to a cmake STM32CubeMX generated project for the NUCLEO-H563ZI board.The LwIP component does not appear to be included in the STM32H5 package although the FreeRTOS component is.Is there a way to modify my top level CMakeList file to add it manually? 

After a period of not touching the software.Unable to open a project.Tells me to update software.Existing software 6.9.2Software to update 6.14.1.Doesn't let me check the box.I am an administrator on this computer.How can I open the project and start working.

Is there any plan to support creating ATfE-based camke projects in CubeMX?ATfE link: https://github.com/arm/arm-toolchain

I have some other third party utilities and code I would like to populate under the /Middlewares/Third_Party folder. I have the freertos component selected in STM32CubeMX .ioc file and I noticed every time I regenerate code it wipes out the Third_Party folder and repopulates with its's CMSIS and FreeRTOS stuff. ... but also deleting my other sources. Is there a way of preventing this?

Hi How to implement BLE [X-NUCLEO-BNRG2A1] Mesh on Nucleo-F401 and Nucleo-L433 boards?

Hi all,We would like to set BUILD_IN_SOURCE to false when building the two cores on the stm32h747 along with passing some other cmake options, but I don't see anywhere to change settings like that in CubeMX. Right now, we are just editing mx-generated.cmake by hand to set those options and to add more to each ExternalProject call after CMAKE_ARGS and restoring the file every time CubeMX overwrites it.How do we pass -DOPTIONs to each ExternalProject? How would we set BUILD_IN_SOURCE (and why is it defaulted to true?) ?Thank you

software problem after and before update CubeMX and IDEhi therecould you help me with this;after updating CUBMX to latest one 6.14.1, does not open the project automatically , even when i open it from IDE with existing project from CUB MX option , still comes up with this error ; This file has been generated with STM32CubeMX version '6.14.1'.Your current STM32CubeMX version is '6.4.0'.Please check for update: Help > Check for Updates THE FUNNY THING IS THE LATEST UPDATE FOR CUB MX IS 6.14.1 SO WHY DETECTS THE VERSION WRONG, WHICH IS NOT EXIST ( 6.4)!? SO I CAN NO LUNCH PROJECT FROM CUB MX TO IDE either.  could you help me with this? regardsAli10

When generating code with CubeMX (Version 6.14.1) for the STM32N657X0 with the following clock configuration for SAI1:

Ubuntu 23.10Tried to load an older project in 6.12.0, CubeMx Asked to convert or continue. Selecting continue.IT start to unzip the tarball and then stops. cube has no error screen, but the log shows as followsUpdating to CubeMX 6.12.1 yields  the  same result. Looked up the tabrall and it can be opened.Note: With the option MIGRATE could open the project.2024-09-19 20:55:38,081 [INFO] I2cTimingTraitement:330 - 0x10C0ECFF2024-09-19 20:55:38,101 [INFO] I2cTimingTraitement:330 - 0x108082C42024-09-19 20:55:39,806 [INFO] MicroXplorer:468 - Change Database Path :2024-09-19 20:55:39,806 [INFO] MicroXplorer:498 - Change Database Version : DB.6.0.1202024-09-19 20:55:39,900 [WARN] ThirdParty:871 - waiting for thirdparty lock release [close project]2024-09-19 20:55:39,900 [INFO] ThirdParty:873 - entering critical section [close project]2024-09-19 20:55:39,900 [INFO] ThirdParty:883 - exiting critical sectio

I can open the project generated by STM32CubeMX normally, but when I try to open it through the folder, it becomes unresponsive and keeps lagging. Why does this happen, and what can I do to fix it?

Hello everyone, I have the following question: when, as in the attached image, you see a peripheral like the USART1 in yellow (in conflict with other peripherals), is it still possible to use it? I ask this information because I am looking for a NUCLEO card that best meets my specifications and I want to avoid buying a card for which I can not use the peripherals I need to the fullest.

Hello, I'm working on a project using the STM32F429I-DISC1 board and need to implement CAN communication. I'm using TouchGFX for the GUI, and when I generate the code, only CAN2 is available as an option. CAN2 is mapped to pins PB12 (CAN2_RX) and PB13 (CAN2_TX), but according to the board schematic, these pins are already connected to USB_OTG_HS_ID and USB_OTG_HS_VBUS. Is there any way that I can use CAN with this type of project? I see no other alternate pins. FMC and LTDC are taking up all the other options. Thank you. 

I like to use the CubeMx 6.14.1 generated code (up2date firmware packages) to use DAC 1+2 with GPDMA in circular mode (Standard-Request-Mode)The 1st thing that makes me wonder: Although I selected "Standard Request Mode" in CubeMX a configuration for Linked-ListMode is generated. Nevertheless this seems to work with ADC. On DAC Channels 1+2 I get a Data-Transfer-Error although I can't figure out a CubeMX missconfiguration for now. See my attached .ioc File for Reference.Expectation: CubeMx generated Standard Request code when selecting this in the GUI. Expectation: DAC generates HAL_DAC_CH1_COMPLETE instead of HAL_DAC_CH1_ERROR with DTE bit set.DMA-Start-Code:HAL_DAC_Start_DMA(&hdac1, DAC_CHANNEL_1, (uint32_t*)output_buffer[0], SAMPLE_BLOCK_SIZE * 2, DAC_ALIGN_12B_R); HAL_DAC_Start_DMA(&hdac1, DAC_CHANNEL_2, (uint3

I'm working on a project that needs both TouchGFX GUI and CAN communication. After configuring my STM32F429 with TouchGFX, I'm unable to enable CAN1 in STM32CubeMX. From what  I understand, CAN2 is a slave/dependent peripheral that requires CAN1 to be active, so I need CAN1 functioning first. If I create a can task with CAN2 it does not work (Loopback mode), and if I enable CAN1 the display will stop working.Is there a recommended pin configuration that allows both TouchGFX and CAN to coexist?Has anyone successfully implemented both TouchGFX and CAN on the F429?Thanks!

I would like to use ADC1_IN15 and ADC1_IN16 in STM32U073MCT6 for measuring voltage and current.However, it says that it is available if sequencer set to not fully configurable for Sequencer on parameter settings.I will do anything with sequencer. I am just measure the voltage value with adc.when I select the 'set to not fully'  parameter, after that,  error occurs in ADC_Regular_ConversionModewhat can I do? for just measure the adc value?  

The code for USART6 is not generated by STM32CubeMX tool for STM32F207ZGT6 MCU. I am trying to generate the baremetal code. I have created a default IOC file for this MCU, and configured USART6 as Ascychronous mode. After this I wanted to configure the clock for the USART, but the clock configuration is not visible for USART6.I tried generating the code after this, this step was successful. However, I don't find any code related to USART eg., initialization, RX/TX functions.  I have tried configuring the USART6 for Synchronous mode, this also doesn't generated the USART code.I have aswell tried the other USART/UART interfaces for Asynchronous and other modes, the result is the same. Clock configuration not visible, and the related code is not generated. Can you please let me know if any additional configuration to be done in addition. 

Hi,Can you please help me for below  I am using NUCLEO-C071RB development board ,I am generating the code using CUBE MX software(V6.14.1) following steps I have followed Step 1:Selected the board as NUCLEO-C071RBStep 2:From project manager I have selected the Toolchain/IDE as EWARM and other configuration as below Step 3:Clicked on generate code Step 4:a .eww file is generated and I opened the file using IAR software the code builds completly without erros but, I am getting the following notification during opening of file 

Last question. Can I use stm32cubeMX also for my project or is it better to continue with CUBE IDE?

I cannot find the lwIP component for FreeRTOS in the latest STM32MX options.I installed the package FreeRTOS from the package install STMicroelectronics tab but lwIP is not available nor do I see and option to install the package.Can this be installed locally? Do I have to integrate the hard way?

I'm trying the example for STEVAL-STWINBX1 but when i use cubemx/cubeide example selector for STEVAL-STWINBX1, i only see 3 BLE and 1 NFC example but the SDDataLogFilex is missing.Is this normal ? How can i get the SDDataLogFilex example ?

Hi all,I am currently using the Nucleo-H723ZG and having difficulties with the clock management using version 1.12.1 of the stm32h7 cubeMx package.The first symptom I encountered was that my USART2 baudrate was three times lower than expected. A few researches led me to posts where similar issues where described and supposed to be patched in 1.12.1 as in this post.Digging a bit more on the subject, I noticed that HAL_RCC_GetPCLK1Freq(); and HAL_RCC_GetPCLK2Freq(); were both returning very strange values. Both functions output 429687488 which is way to high considering that STM32CubeMX caps the value at 137.5Mhz in the GUI. Following on this I got the following results:HAL_RCC_GetHCLKFreq() -> 859374976HAL_RCC_GetSysClockFreq() -> 1718749952which doesn't look wright at all...