STM32CubeMX (MCUs)

Hello ST Community,I would like to report a potential discrepancy I have discovered between the pin definitions in STM32CubeMX and the official datasheet for the STM32N6 series, specifically concerning the Serial Wire Output (SWO) signal used for debugging (SWV/ITM). This issue led to a hardware design error on my part, and I believe it warrants clarification to prevent others from encountering the same problem.According to the STM32N647xx datasheet (and related family documents), the SWO function is assigned to Pin PB5, The TRACECLK function is assigned to Pin PB3However, within STM32CubeMX (I am using version 6.16.1)(N6 MCU package version 1.3.0), the graphical pinout view shows that Pin PB3 is also listed with the "DEBUG-JTDO-SWO" functionality. More importantly, when configuring the debug port in the "SYS" settings (e.g., selecting "Trace Asynchronous Sw

do the example of LPGPIO,why show this error.Getting started with LPBAM - stm32mcu 

I have just spoken with an ST sidekick, and I was informed that STM32CubeMX is currently not supported on Windows ARM64.Thank you for the clarification.  

Question moved from this post. Hi @mƎALLEm ,I am using STMCubeIDE with cubeMX, in that there is no such configuration for VREFBUF. is there any alternative way for that?

On a Nucleo-H563ZI with CubeIDE 1.14.0 and firmware package for H5 1.1.1.I managed to get SPI transmit and receive using DMA, triggered by a timer, going not using linked lists. I get my requested number of transmissions and results into my buffers as witnessed on an oscilloscope and a live watchpoint.But when I enable circular mode, no other modifications, in MX_SPI1_Init - HAL_SPI_Init - HAL_SPI_MspInit it sets up NodeConfig.Init.SrcDataWidth = DMA_SRC_DATAWIDTH_WORD; NodeConfig.Init.DestDataWidth = DMA_DEST_DATAWIDTH_HALFWORD;builds the node (whatever that is), inserts it into the correct DMA channel, sets circular mode, basically looks like magic but I can imagine what it is doing. But then the stuff in the NodeConfig doesn't get applied to handle_GPDMA1_Channel1, so later w

CubeMX 6.16.1 MacOS 15.7.3 IntelSTM32H563ZITxI have a project using FreeRTOS with 5 tasks.If you go into <Categories><X-CUBE_FREERTOS>Choose <Tasks and Queues> click on one of the tasks. An Edit panel comes up to help you set all sorts of stuff.Click on "Task name" column header to re-sort the list according to task name and click on one of the tasks. The Edit panel comes up for the wrong task.The changes you make get applied to the task shown, but the wrong task gets shown.That is all

I'm attempting to follow https://community.st.com/t5/stm32-mcus/using-the-itm-console-for-printf-redirects-and-lwip-debug/tac-p/850072/highlight/true#M1661 but this always fails. This is on an STM32F303K8T. My reference manual saysand offers an example:    "To output a simple value to the TPIU:• Configure the TPIU and assign TRACE I/Os by configuring the DBGMCU_CR (refer toS

Pull field is not set on UART8 GPIO when configured as single-wire.STM32H743 / STM32H753. 

I'm using STM32CubeMX for STM32N657x0HxQ controller. I would like to use ST ISP Library to handle MB1854 camera module. But I could not find the X-CUBE-ISP in STM32CubeMX Pinout & Configuration page, which is as follows. So I tried to import x-cube-isp.zip file downloaded from GitHub. But I came across the following error message.

I'm using STM32N6570-DK board and developing an image processing application.When I tried to use STM32CubeMX to generate the project, I was able to set DCMIPP Pipe1 just like the attached screen capture.I would like to downsize the source image data to 800x480, but I could not find the option field in the DCMIPP Configuration view in STM32CubeMX.Is there something that I missed?My STM32CubeMX is Version 6.16.1 for Windows 11.  

Hello, I'm working with the STM32H7S7L8-DK and i want to use both USB HS and FS in device mode  but it seems in cube mx that i'm unable to enable both IRQ If i enable the HS one the FS one isn't generated and same fort the other way Is it a bug  and how manage this to get it work?Thanks 

Hi,after updating STM32CubeMX, I was no longer able to start the program without admin rights.In the past, I always used STM32CubeMX integrated with STM32CubeIDE and was able to update everything without any admin rights. Starting with version 2.0.0 of STM32CubeIDE, STM32CubeMX was removed, so I installed it separately (STM32CubeMX 6.16.0). For the installation, my company's IT department selected the installation for all users, and until now I have been able to use the program without any problems.I needed to update STM32CubeMX to the new version 6.16.1, and that's where I ran into my first problem: I couldn't update to the new version without admin rights, so I had to contact the IT department to do the update. The big problem is that after the update, I was no longer able to start the program without admin rights, and the quickest solution was to uninstall STM32CubeMX and then install version 6.16.1 directly. Now I can use the application again without a

Hello!I have encountered a problem - I am unable to create a project for STM32F769I-DISCO board with both FreeRTOS using CMSIS_V2 interface and LwIP with NO_SYS parameter set to "OS Used".In old project that was setup with STM32CubeMX V6.14.0 using STM32Cube FW-F7 V1.17.2 I had no problem with setting both CMSIS_V2 and "OS Used" value.In new project that uses STM32CubeMX V6.16.1 and STM32Cube FW_F7 V1.14.4 I have to use CMSIS_V1 interface for FreeRTOS if I want to change LwIP's NO_SYS parameter to "OS Used".Did something change in recent updates, is it a bug or am I doing something wrong? Thank You for help in advance. 

Hi @TDK ,I have just downloaded and installed the new version 2.0.0 of the IDE and the MX software (since it is no longer integrated). I was working on a project based on the STM32WB5MMG, and everything was working correctly with IDE version 1.19.0 and STM32Cube FW_WB V1.23.0.After opening the project and regenerating the code with the new IDE version and STM32Cube FW_WB V1.24.0, I noticed some issues: in custom_stm.c it generates two times this variables:/* USER CODE BEGIN PM */ /* USER CODE END PM */ /* Private variables ---------------------------------------------------------*/ uint16_t SizeFw_Ver = 1; uint16_t SizeDatetime = 7; uint16_t SizeStatus = 6; uint16_t SizeMonitor = 15; uint16_t SizeEnv_Data = 90; uint16_t SizeFw_Ver = 1; uint16_t SizeDatetime = 7; uint16_t SizeSta

When choosing SmartCard mode for USART, parameter Parity is automatically set to Even. However generated code in usart.c, does not has:hsmartcard1.Init.Parity = SMARTCARD_PARITY_EVEN;Only when I manually reselect that in GUI, the parity will be set in the generated code.I am using Nucleo-G0B1RE.

I need to use STM32CubeMX to generate initialization routine for two pins (7,8) on SO8 package of STM32CubeC011 MCU that switches the pin's roles BACK to STLINK mode. I created a new project on STM32CubeMX whose only task is to initialize pins 7 and 8 to PA13/PA14 SWCLK/SWDIO. I wanted to copy the GPIO initialization function MX generated into an existing application which had previously (that is, after start-up) changed the two pins to another mode; after that work is done, the two pins no longer need to be in GPIO mode and can be switched back to STLINK mode to facilitate firmware upgrade/debug/etc.Two screen captures from STLINK32MX are below (pin assignments and project specifications.)The resulting (very short) C language program generates the following code for initialization of the two pins: static void MX_GPIO_Init(void) { /* USER CODE BEGIN MX_GPIO_Init_1 */ /* USER CODE END MX_GPIO_Init_1 */ /* GPI

When I open the official example using the example selector, CubeMX cannot display the graphical configuration of that example. I would like to know if it is possible to display the graphical configuration of the example in CubeMX. Thank you very much, because that would make learning much easier.

Hello!I tried to generate the code for SDMMC using CMake, but was facing an error that did not let me finish building the project. The error was:".../FileX/Target/fx_stm32_sd_driver_glue.c:40:(.text.fx_stm32_sd_init+0xc): undefined reference to `MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init'".Also, using ThreadX and FileX. In FileX I enabled the setting "FX Driver Initializes the SD IP" (set to true).I saw that the MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init function is inside the main.c file, but it is declared with the "static". So, right now, to be able to build the project with CMake, I need to manually remove the "static" from the MX_SDMMC1_SD_Init function definition in main.c file.

STM32CubeMX v6.16.1 has a small bug. Under Project Manager - Code Generator - HAL settings is an option to pick under which context the free pins should be set as a analog. I am using STM32N6 which has 3 contexts (FSBL, App, ExtMemLoader).The problem is that CubeMX doesn't store (or recall) this setting. I want to set them under Appli, but on every program start it sets the context to FSBL. After doing same "fix" for tens of times it gets quite annoying.

Hi,I'm building a BLE application using custom template in STM32CubeMX. I have two services. The first one has only one characteristic with the properties "Read" and "Write without response". The second service has two characteristics, both with "Read" and "Notify" properties.The code generated in "custom_app.c" have the function:void Custom_<Srv2Char1>_Update_Char(void){...} void Custom_<Srv2Char1>_Send_Notification(void){...} void Custom_<Srv2Char2>_Update_Char(void){...} void Custom_<Srv2Char2>_Send_Notification(void){...}However, no function is generated for the characteristic of the first service. I expected to have a function like this:void Custom_<Srv1Char1>_Update_Char(void){...} I performed some tests:Used shorter names for the characteristics.Created two new char

Hello, It seems that the pin for TIM1_CH3N  should be PE12 as per schematic but CubeMX shows it as PB0. Please correct it and let me know how to fix it at my end for time being. 

CubeMX 6.16.0's "Memory Management" Tool assumes Rx_PoolSection size to coincide with the Eth "Rx Buffers Length" - is that correct? I used CubeMX 6.16.0 to create a project for an STM32 H755ZI-Q.Then I opted to use the Tools -> "Memory Management" tool and afterwards enabled the ETH [ethernet] component. This automatically generated the required sections in the "Memory Management" tool. Great.Then I enabled LwIP [with RTOS and CMSIS v2] and generated code.Compiling this code worked - linking however did not. It told me the contents of Rx_PoolSection were too big, i.e. the section too small: EBoxNG3_CM7.elf section `.Rx_PoolSection' will not fit in region `Rx_PoolSection'region `Rx_PoolSection' overflowed by 225668  The buffer for the RX_POOL is declared in CM7\LWIP\Target\ethernetif.c:98:#defin

Hello,I was using STM32CubeMX, but starting two days ago, when I launch the program, only the splash screen appears and the STM32CubeMX does not proceed any further.1. I have tried deleting the program, restarting the computer, reinstalling it, and running it again.2. Adding a new user is not possible; the user creation permission is restricted to the company's IT administrator.I would appreciate any suggestions on additional steps I could take to resolve this issue.

I have a Discovery board B-L072Z-LRWAN1 and I am trying to set up a project using CubeIDE but get the following, So I check to see if the L0 & LRWAN packages are in the repository, Yes, they're there. I click OK & Cube carries on setting it

We have a board with a stm32u5. were VDDIO are connected to 1.8 V and  the I2C bus have pullup to 3.0 V. Some I2C devices uses 3.0 V logic levels and som 1.8 V. Between which voltage levels shall i measure the rise and falltime that i enter in cubemx. 30%->70% of 1.8 V or 3.0 V .We have possibility to turn off and on some devices on the bus that changes the rise and falltime on the bus. Shall then the longer or shorter rise/falltimes be used?One reason we are asking is that our design engineers wonder why the signal of the clock never is piece w